compressor surge control valves – Explained

Home / compressor surge control valves – Explained

Huge steps have been made in recent years to deal with the environmental impact certain industrial services have on our ecology. Petroleum companies are doing their best to provide our essential carbon emission fuels with an altogether greener spin attached to their advertising campaigns. Has anything really changed? Maybe it has to a degree but ultimately all industrial companies have a responsibility to change their carbon footprint status, whether an international enterprise or a local building contractor.Visit the site How to handle compressor surge control valves.

Unfortunately this change is more than often side stepped for economical reasons and financial constraints. A reluctance to deviate from the norm is helping to stagnate our attempts to move away from accepted industry services that are only helping to add to our overall footprint.

Within the building maintenance, cleaning and construction industry rope access techniques are slowly being accepted as a serious form of access and egress in the work place. Rope access offers minimal environmental impact and is extremely cost effective compared to conventional access methods such as scaffolding, MEWPS, cranes and cradle systems. The flexibility rope access can offer is unbeatable, ropes can be set up or removed in less than one hour and in most cases the labor time to complete the task at hand is easily comparable to any other form of access.

Obviously there are scenarios where multiple tradesmen require access to a specific construction area and scaffolding is the sensible approach but there are equally as many scenarios where scaffolding has been erected around the entire perimeter of a city building block that requires minimal repair work to existing window frames for example or brick re pointing, concrete repair etc. This approach is entirely unjustified and creates an unnecessarily large carbon footprint that could be avoided with the use of rope access techniques. This scenario is repeated across many cities time and time again, tonnes and tonnes of unnecessary scaffolding that creates an unsightly environment, attracts a building site mentality, creates more traffic (the scaffolding has to be delivered), provides considerable noise pollution and is generally unattractive. MEWPS, cherry pickers etc whilst very effective in certain scenarios are also extremely noisy and emit a lot of fumes from diesel or petrol exhausts.

Rope access is the alternative that can eliminate all of the above effectively. Ropes can be removed at the end of the working day thus leaving the building to function normally out of hours without the long term disruption that scaffolding causes. Work areas can be kept small and compact within a specific zone as opposed to 10 floors of scaffolding for work to be carried out normally on less than 2 or 3 of these floors. Noise pollution is considerably decreased and the set up and removal time is almost eliminated resulting in the same quality of workmanship without the obvious strains that conventional access methods create.

Whilst building owners and construction firms are beginning to realize the effectiveness of rope access it is still considered a last resort when conventional access forms are impossible to impose or far too costly. It is this stubbornness or tendency to rely on industry accepted norms that is holding the industrial world back in regards to it’s environmental responsibilities. Rope access has serious advantages that should be utilized far more effectively within the business sector, it has an exemplary safety record with stringent regulations and training, rescue procedures are commonly practiced and the industry as a whole prides itself on it’s safety awareness. The responsibility for the environment falls on us all, but industrially all business’ can make an effort to reduce their impact and rope access is one of many options available.

About Auther